Two monies, one economy
Here's the cleanest way to frame it. Every modern economy runs on two monies at once, and they are working in opposite directions:
The "red thread" is this: the rate at which fiat loses purchasing power and the rate at which Bitcoin tends to gain value relative to fiat are the same phenomenon seen from two sides. You don't need to believe in "the internet of money" or any ideology to see the mechanics. Money that can be printed infinitely will lose purchasing power. An asset with a hard, visible cap becomes a natural receptacle for that lost value.
Bitcoin is not primarily a payment network in the way Visa is. It's primarily a store of value priced in depreciating units. That's why its price tracks liquidity rather than transactions. Once you see that, a lot of confusing crypto commentary falls away.
What "sound money" actually means
"Sound money" doesn't mean "no volatility." It means four properties:
- Durability — it won't degrade over time (unlike gold, which oxidizes; unlike bank deposits, which can be frozen).
- Portability — small amounts can be moved easily. Bitcoin: $50 worth fits in a text message.
- Divisibility — it can be split into tiny fractions. 1 satoshi = 0.00000001 BTC.
- Verifiable scarcity — you can check the hard cap yourself, without trusting anyone. This last one is what Bitcoin uniquely provides. Gold is scarce, but you can never fully verify the supply. Bitcoin's entire history is inspectable by anyone.
Notice that stability in purchasing power is NOT among these four. Sound money is about credibility of supply, not a flat price. A flat price in a fiat-denominated market is actually a symptom of monetary failure (deflation or currency hoarding), not success. This is one of the most common misunderstandings about "digital gold."
The four-year cycle — and what's actually behind it
Bitcoin has shown a rough four-year rhythm: a halving, a parabolic run, a deep correction, a bottom, repeat. Two things drive it, and they're worth keeping separate:
- The halving (real, mechanical). Every ~4 years, new Bitcoin supply cuts in half. Miners, who sold a fixed amount of their coins to cover energy costs, face a sudden drop in their income. Historically they reduce selling, supply tightens, and price responds. This is a real supply-side shock — not speculation.
- Liquidity (macro-side). The halving sets a rough clock, but the magnitude of each cycle is set by global liquidity — M2, central bank balance sheets, dollar conditions. A strong halving with a loose money environment gives a strong bull. A halving that lands in a tightening cycle (2022 is a candidate) gives a muted one.
Treating the four-year cycle as an oracle. "It's four years, therefore it must go up" was a fatal assumption in 2022. The cycle is a bias, not a prediction. The halving sets the stage; the macro environment determines the show. That's exactly why the Macro cluster exists — it's not a separate topic, it's the other half of the same story.
Stablecoins: where the two worlds collide directly
Stablecoins are the clearest bridge between crypto and the macro world, and they're becoming one of the largest forces in global payments. Here's what's actually happening:
- The mechanism: A stablecoin (USDT, USDC, and now a growing set of bank-issued ones) is a token on a blockchain that is meant to hold a fixed value against the US dollar. It's "digital cash that moves at internet speed."
- The macro link: When you convert fiat into a stablecoin, you're moving real money into a programmable, borderless rails that sits outside the traditional banking system. The dollar becomes portable in a way it's never been before. That's why regulators are paying attention — and why stablecoin issuance is now a macro variable, not just a crypto one.
- The growth: Total stablecoin market cap has grown from near-zero in 2020 to well over $200B in the 2025–2026 period. That's a real money flow, and it's growing fast in emerging markets and in cross-border remittances.
- The risk: A stablecoin is only as good as its issuer's reserve. USDT has faced repeated reserve-transparency questions. A "bank run" on a stablecoin (where people suddenly redeem faster than the issuer can pay out) is a real tail risk. This is the DeFi risk from Stage 1, now scaled to the macro level.
So: what's the actual position?
Stripping out the ideology, the case for Bitcoin rests on three legs that you can evaluate independently:
- The monetary leg (strongest). Fixed supply, rising fiat debasement, institutional adoption as a reserve asset. This is the leg that matters most over 10-year horizons.
- The liquidity leg (currently strongest short-term). M2 expansion, rate cuts, and dollar weakness directly fuel the bid. When the macro side turns, this is where the alpha is.
- The technological leg (weakest as a price driver). Lightning, DeFi, and on-chain apps are real but still a tiny fraction of Bitcoin's market value. This is a 10-year bet, not a 2-year one.
The red thread from AI to Crypto to Macro is now visible in all three clusters. You don't have to pick a side. You can hold the monetary bet (BTC) and the productivity bet (AI) and watch the money supply (Macro) — and all three are telling you related things about the same underlying system.
Next steps
Learning content. This is not investment advice. The debasement thesis is one interpretation of Bitcoin's price driver; it is not the only one, and it has no track record of predicting short-term moves. Stablecoin risks are real and unresolved. Sourced from Raoul Pal, Anthony Pompliano, Jordi Visser, Peter Diamandis & Bankless. The World is Spinning Faster Than Before is an educational project.